Gross Valentino Printing Co. v. Clarke
Illinois Appellate Court
458 N.E.2d 1027 (1983)
- Written by Megan Petersen, JD
Facts
Clarke (defendant) was a publisher of a magazine. Gross Valentino Printing Co. (Gross) (plaintiff) was a printer. In July of 1979, Gross sent Clarke a letter offering to print 15,000 copies of Clarke’s magazine for $6,695.00. Clarke accepted this offer and began working with Gross on the layout of the magazine. Due to problems arising with the layout, Gross was required to send the print job out to a third party. This increased the total cost of printing to $9,300.00. Gross sent Clarke a letter on August 15, 1979 advising Clarke of this fact. Clarke made no objection to the price increase at that time. On August 30, 1979, Gross delivered the first 5,000 magazines to Clarke. Clarke signed the purchase order reflecting the new price and paid Gross $4,650.00. Gross later delivered the remaining 10,000 magazines to Clarke. On October 28, 1979, however, Clarke informed Gross that he would not accept the price increase and refused to pay the remaining balance. Gross brought suit against Clarke in Illinois state court alleging breach of contract. Clarke raised three affirmative defenses: lack of consideration, fraudulent or innocent misrepresentation, and business compulsion. The trial court granted summary judgment for Gross on the three defenses and awarded Gross $5,116.20. Clarke appealed. The appellate court considered the trial court’s grant of summary judgment for Gross on Clarke’s first and third affirmative defenses (lack of consideration and business compulsion).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Goldberg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.