Group de Travail sur les Dossiers Judiciaires Strategiques v. Democratic Republic of the Congo

Communication 259/2002 (2011)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Group de Travail sur les Dossiers Judiciaires Strategiques v. Democratic Republic of the Congo

African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights
Communication 259/2002 (2011)

Facts

In September 2002, the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the commission) received a complaint against the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (defendant) alleging violations of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the charter). The complaint asserted that military courts in the DRC had handed down death sentences for seven children who had been used as child soldiers during a conflict. Six of the children’s sentences had subsequently been commuted to terms of imprisonment, but one of the children was allegedly executed. The complaint asserted that the imposition of the death sentences violated Article 4 of the charter, which protects the right to life. In response, the DRC asserted that the children were child soldiers who had been tried for serious offenses, including criminal conspiracy, armed robbery, and murder, all of which were subject to the death penalty under Congolese law. The complaint further asserted violations of Article 7 of the charter, which protects the right to a fair hearing. The complaint contended that the military courts’ decisions were not appealable and that the children had not been assisted by counsel during the military-court proceedings. The DRC argued that even though the military courts’ decisions were not appealable, the possibility of a presidential pardon existed for convicted individuals. The DRC further noted that the children should have been appointed counsel, though the DRC could not provide proof that the children had actually received assistance. The commission determined that the complaint was admissible and then considered the complaint’s merits.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (1)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership