Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

Grove Fresh Distributors, Inc. v. Everfresh Juice Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
24 F.3d 893 (7th Cir. 1994)


Facts

Grove Fresh Distributors, Inc. (Grove Fresh) (plaintiff) filed two separate actions against several competing orange juice companies, including Everfresh Juice Co. (defendant), alleging that the defendants were mislabeling and adulterating their products, in violation of Food and Drug Administration regulations, federal anti-competition laws, and the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) statute. In the first case (the 89 case), the court issued a protective order preventing Grove Fresh from disclosing confidential information obtained from the defendants. In the second case (the 90 case), the entire court file was sealed by the court. Two different sets of interveners attempted to be joined in order to modify the protective order and vacate the seal on the two cases. The first set of interveners was comprised of consumers, bringing suit based on fraud and breach of warranty. The court denied their motion to intervene, holding that the consumers lacked standing and would not suffer any prejudice from the denial. The second group of interveners, the Ad Hoc Coalition of In-Depth Journalists (Coalition), was comprised of professional journalists alleging that they were impermissibly denied access to the documents protected by seal and the protective order. The court recognized the Coalition’s right to access the documents, but ruled for expedience sake that the Coalition would be forced to wait until the proceedings were finished for access. Both sets of interveners appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Bauer, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 128,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 176 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.