Gruebele v. Geringer

640 N.W.2d 454 (2002)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gruebele v. Geringer

Supreme Court of North Dakota
640 N.W.2d 454 (2002)

Facts

In 1975, Raymond Guthmiller purchased a piece of property (Tract 1) adjacent to property (Tract 2) owned by John Guthmiller and Elizabeth Guthmiller. A garage had previously been built on the property line of the two tracts. At the time Raymond purchased Tract 1 in 1975, John and Elizabeth gave Raymond permission to use the garage, and the two adjacent owners shared the use of the building. In 1977, Harry Wallenvein purchased Tract 1. In 1994, Reinhold Gruebele and Marion Gruebele (plaintiffs) purchased Tract 2 and began storing gardening tools, a boat, and a pickup truck in the garage. In 1996, Lawson Geringer (defendant) purchased Tract 1. After Geringer’s purchase, the Gruebeles removed their property from the garage and told Geringer that the garage was on the property line and needed to be moved. The Gruebeles then brought action to quiet title to Tract 2, and Geringer argued that he owned the disputed property under the doctrine of adverse possession. The trial court held that Geringer had failed to show exclusive and continuous possession of the property, and ordered title to the property quieted as to Geringer’s claims. Geringer appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Neumann, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 748,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership