Gruen v. Gruen
New York Court of Appeals
496 N.E.2d 869, 68 N.Y.2d 869, 505 N.Y.S.2d 849 (1986)
- Written by Richard Lavigne, JD
Facts
Victor Gruen sent a series of letters to his son, Michael (plaintiff), indicating his intention to give Michael a valuable painting for his twenty-first birthday. Victor did not deliver the painting but kept it in his multiple residences. The painting was to be given to Michael upon Victor’s death, with Victor holding a life estate in the painting. Michael acknowledged the gift to his friends and associates and held both letters for over 17 years to verify the gift after his father’s death. Upon Victor’s death, Victor’s wife and Michael’s stepmother, Ms. Gruen (defendant), refused to give Michael the painting. Michael then brought this action. The special term court determined that by retaining a life estate in the painting, Victor invalidated the gift. Michael appealed. The Appellate Division found that a gift is valid even if a life estate is retained in the gift. Ms. Gruen petitioned for certiorari to the New York Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Simons, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
