Grundy v. Thurston County
Washington Supreme Court
117 P.3d 1089 (2005)

- Written by Colette Routel, JD
Facts
Evelyne Grundy (plaintiff) purchased oceanfront property in 1981. The Brack Family Trust (Brack) (defendant) purchased adjacent land approximately 10 years later. At the time of these purchases, both properties had seawalls. Grundy’s seawall, however, was approximately a foot higher than Brack’s seawall. As a result, waters from Puget Sound routinely flooded a portion of Brack’s property during winter storms, while Grundy’s property remained dry. Several years after purchasing the property, Brack raised its seawall by more than 16 inches. After that, Brack’s property was no longer flooded during storms, but Grundy’s property was. Grundy sued Brack, arguing that Brack’s construction of the seawall created private nuisance that damaged and would continue to damage her property. Brack argued that the common-enemy doctrine, which allows each landowner to deal with surface waters on his or her property as the landowner pleases without facing liability from neighboring landowners, precluded Grundy’s private-nuisance claim. The trial court and the Washington Court of Appeals agreed with Brack. Grundy appealed to the Washington Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ireland, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.