Grunfeder v. Heckler
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
748 F.2d 503 (1984)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Felicia Grunfeder (plaintiff) was smuggled out of the Warsaw ghetto as a young child by being placed in a coffin and lifted over the fence that separated the Jewish and Polish cemeteries. Grunfeder lived with a family in the Polish section of Warsaw until the family was sent to a concentration camp. At the end of the war, Grunfeder and her mother were reunited and moved to the United States. Grunfeder’s father and other family members were killed by the Nazis. In response to demands for reparations after the war, the Federal Republic of Germany adopted legislation that provided for restitution for lost property, possessions, and economic advancement and for injury to body and health. As a result of her wartime experiences, Grunfeder developed disabling psychological problems and petitioned for and received monthly reparations payments from the German government. Grunfeder also applied for and received supplemental-security-income (SSI) benefits. The United States Social Security Administration (SSA) determined that the reparations payments were unearned income that made Grunfeder ineligible for SSI benefits and terminated Grunfeder’s benefits. Margaret Heckler (defendant), as secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, denied Grunfeder’s motion for reconsideration. Grunfeder’s appeal was denied, as was her request for a review of the administrative-law judge’s denial of her appeal. Grunfeder filed an action against Heckler seeking review of the administrative-law judge’s decision. The district court dismissed the complaint. Grunfeder appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pregerson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.