Grunfeder v. Heckler

748 F.2d 503 (1984)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Grunfeder v. Heckler

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
748 F.2d 503 (1984)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Felicia Grunfeder (plaintiff) was smuggled out of the Warsaw ghetto as a young child by being placed in a coffin and lifted over the fence that separated the Jewish and Polish cemeteries. Grunfeder lived with a family in the Polish section of Warsaw until the family was sent to a concentration camp. At the end of the war, Grunfeder and her mother were reunited and moved to the United States. Grunfeder’s father and other family members were killed by the Nazis. In response to demands for reparations after the war, the Federal Republic of Germany adopted legislation that provided for restitution for lost property, possessions, and economic advancement and for injury to body and health. As a result of her wartime experiences, Grunfeder developed disabling psychological problems and petitioned for and received monthly reparations payments from the German government. Grunfeder also applied for and received supplemental-security-income (SSI) benefits. The United States Social Security Administration (SSA) determined that the reparations payments were unearned income that made Grunfeder ineligible for SSI benefits and terminated Grunfeder’s benefits. Margaret Heckler (defendant), as secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, denied Grunfeder’s motion for reconsideration. Grunfeder’s appeal was denied, as was her request for a review of the administrative-law judge’s denial of her appeal. Grunfeder filed an action against Heckler seeking review of the administrative-law judge’s decision. The district court dismissed the complaint. Grunfeder appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pregerson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership