Guard v. Jackson

940 P.2d 642 (1997)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Guard v. Jackson

Washington Supreme Court
940 P.2d 642 (1997)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Toni Rae Guard (plaintiff) and Jeffrey Beeston were the unmarried parents of a young child. Beeston failed to pay any court-ordered child support to Guard, who had custody of their child. The child was hit and killed by a truck driver, John Jackson (defendant). Guard sued Jackson in state court under a Washington statute that allowed mothers of illegitimate children to bring wrongful-death actions. Beeston sought to join the suit as a plaintiff. Guard and Jackson opposed. The statute that authorized mothers to bring suit did not allow fathers to join unless the father had regularly contributed to the child’s support. The trial court found the statute was constitutional and dismissed Beeston from the action because he owed child support to Guard. Subsequently, the court of appeals reversed the judgment, holding that the statute violated the equal-rights amendment to the Washington constitution, which precluded the denial of equal rights based on gender. Guard petitioned the Washington Supreme Court for review, and a review was granted.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dolliver, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 781,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership