Gucci America, Inc. v. Guess?, Inc.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
868 F. Supp. 2d 207 (2012)
- Written by Ann Wooster, JD
Facts
Gucci America, Inc. (Gucci) (plaintiff) was a global fashion company with a reputation as one of the largest luxury-product brands in the world. Guess?, Inc. (Guess) (defendant), an international competitor, created an entire product line that imitated nonfunctional elements of Gucci’s product design, or trade dress. Gucci’s Diamond Motif trade dress included a trademarked repeating “GG” diamond-shaped pattern, with two inverted Gs in each corner, in brown and beige colors. Guess’s trademarked Quattro G Pattern depicted repeating squares, rather than diamonds, with Gs in the corners. Guess provided fabric with the Quattro G Pattern to handbag makers who created a two-tone woven canvas design in brown and beige. Individuals associated with Guess and its licensees commented in writing about the similarity of the fabric’s Quattro G Pattern to Gucci’s Diamond Motif pattern. Guess continued to produce handbags, shoes, and other products using this fabric design. Gucci brought suit against Guess for trade-dress infringement in violation of the Lanham Trade-Mark Act. Gucci claimed that the similarity of the Quattro G Pattern to the distinctive Diamond Motif nonfunctional-design elements was likely to cause post-sale confusion among observers of the products. The district court conducted a bench trial, and the parties submitted posttrial proposed findings and conclusions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Scheindlin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.