Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Guidelines on the Treatment of Foreign Direct Investment

Development Committee of the World Bank Group
31 I.L.M. 1379 (1992)


Facts

During the 1970s, the United Nations took on the task of determining a national standard for how foreign direct investments were to be treated. However, stark disagreement among countries on the issue made the task an impossible pursuit. The World Bank attempted the same feat in 1985, but again experienced insurmountable pushback from the international community. The World Bank tried again in 1991, when Ibrahim Shihata, the vice president and general counsel of the World Bank and the head of the Development Committee, a working group of the World Bank, decided that the World Bank should create guidelines, considered “soft law” or non-binding declaratory rules of conduct, instead of attempting to draft a convention. The Development Committee drafted proposed guidelines, including a provision that set the general standard of compensation for expropriation as “appropriate” and stated that compensation that was “adequate, effective, and paid without undue delay” would generally be considered appropriate. The Development Committee distributed the proposed guidelines to various governments and businesses in order to gather comments. The United States was one of the strongest dissenters to numerous guidelines, particularly the standard for expropriation. The Development Committee eventually revised the guidelines and published the Guidelines on the Treatment of Foreign Direct Investment in 1992 (the Guidelines).

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.