Guille v. Swan
New York Supreme Court
19 Johns. 381 (1822)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Charles Guille (defendant) launched a hot-air balloon near an area farmed by Swan (plaintiff). Guille encountered difficulty in the air and ended up hanging off the side of the balloon’s basket. As the balloon came down, Guille called for help, attracting the attention of approximately 200 people. Guille’s balloon landed on Swan’s crops, causing about $15 in damage. However, the crowd of helpers and onlookers broke through fences and trampled additional crops, causing Swan another $75 in damages. Swan sued Guille for the damages. The trial court told the jury that Guille was responsible for all of Swan’s damages relating to the balloon crash, and the jury returned a verdict against Guille for $90. Guille appealed the verdict, arguing that he was responsible only for the $15 of damages he had caused directly.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Spencer, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 783,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.