Gulden v. Sloan

311 N.W.2d 568 (1981)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gulden v. Sloan

Supreme Court of North Dakota
311 N.W.2d 568 (1981)

Facts

Gulden (plaintiff) leased a house in Imperial Valley and had an option to purchase the house for $62,400. When Gulden had difficulty making the lease payments, Gulden and his landlord agreed that, if they could find another purchaser, Gulden could keep any amount that exceeded the $62,400. Sloan (defendant), whom Gulden had known for some 30 years, expressed interest in purchasing the Imperial Valley home. Gulden alleged that he and Sloan orally agreed that Gulden would abandon his purchase option and that Sloan would purchase the home for $68,400. In exchange, Sloan would give Gulden title to his mobile home. Sloan completed the purchase and took possession of the house while Gulden moved into the mobile home formerly occupied by Sloan. Sloan did not transfer title to Gulden, which prompted Gulden to sue for specific performance of their oral agreement. The trial court awarded Gulden $6,000, the difference between the purchase price and the option price, as Sloan had sold the mobile home to someone else before the trial ended. Sloan appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Erickstad, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership