From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
United States Supreme Court
453 U.S. 473 (1981)
Mobil Oil Corporation (Mobil) (plaintiff) contracted with Gulf Offshore Company (Gulf) (defendant) for work on Mobil’s oil-drilling platforms off the coast of Louisiana. Gulf promised to indemnify Mobil for claims resulting from the work. Steven Gaedecke was a Gulf employee who worked on an offshore platform located above the Outer Continental Shelf (the shelf). Gaedecke was injured on a Mobil-chartered boat while evacuating during a hurricane and brought a personal-injury action against Mobil in Texas state court. Mobil sought indemnification from Gulf. Gulf asserted that the state court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over Mobil’s claim because Mobil’s cause of action arose under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA), a federal statute that declared exclusive federal political jurisdiction over the shelf and granted federal district courts original jurisdiction over cases and controversies connected to operations conducted on the shelf. Congress enacted OCSLA to ensure federal control over the shelf and its mineral resources, while being mindful of the relationship between offshore-platform workers and adjacent shore communities. The Texas court rejected Gulf’s jurisdiction argument and ultimately entered a $900,000 judgment against Gulf for Gaedecke’s injuries. The state appellate court affirmed. The appellate court noted, among other things, that exclusive federal-court jurisdiction was unnecessary because in personal-injury actions involving events on the shelf, OCSLA adopted laws from the state adjacent to the events as the governing federal law. Thus, a federal court and state court would have applied the same law in Gaedecke’s action. The Texas Supreme Court denied review, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.