Gulf Restoration Network v. McCarthy
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
783 F.3d 227 (2015)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
The Clean Water Act is meant to protect water quality through the regulation of pollution. The Clean Water Act explains that states are initially responsible for creating and implementing water-quality standards but also empowers the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendant) to set water-quality standards for a state if the EPA determines that a new standard is necessary to comply with the statute. This determination is called a necessity determination. The Gulf Restoration Network (the Network) (plaintiff) petitioned the EPA to create water-quality standards for nitrogen and phosphorus pollution in the Mississippi River Basin and the northern Gulf of Mexico. The EPA refused, arguing that the affected states should take the lead in implementing new water-quality standards. The Network alleged that the EPA violated the Clean Water Act and Administrative Procedures Act by failing to make a necessity determination. The EPA moved to dismiss the case, arguing its decision to make a necessity determination is a discretionary act that is not reviewable by a court. The district court ruled that it had jurisdiction to review the claim and ordered the EPA to make a necessity determination. The EPA appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Higginbotham, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
