Gunn v. Robertson

801 So. 2d 555 (2001)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gunn v. Robertson

Louisiana Court of Appeals
801 So. 2d 555 (2001)

Play video

Facts

Randall Gunn (plaintiff) was involved in a minor traffic accident when his car lightly hit a vehicle driven by James Robertson (defendant). Both cars were travelling approximately 10 miles per hour at the time of the accident. After being examined by a physician approximately one week later Gunn was diagnosed with having a chronic spinal defect that may have been triggered by the accident and required surgery to correct. Gunn and his wife, Tammy, filed suit for damages against Gunn and his insurance carrier, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) (defendant). The Gunns sought general damages plus past and future medicals, wages, and Randall’s loss of earning capacity as a self-employed welder. Additionally, Tammy and the Gunns’ children filed a claim for loss of consortium. At trial, the Gunns submitted evidence of past medical expenses in the amount of $13,942.19 and future medical costs related to the surgery in the amount of $59,915. After a trial, the jury held for the Gunns, concluding that Robertson was 70 percent negligent and that Randall was 30 percent negligent. The jury awarded damages in the amounts of $1,000 for Randall’s physical pain and suffering, $1,700 for Randall’s past medical expenses, and $5,400 in lost wages but did not award any monies on the loss of consortium claim. The Gunns appealed the trial court’s finding of comparative fault and the amount of the general and special damages awarded.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gothard, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 778,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership