Gustafson v. Cotco Enterprises, Inc.

42 Ohio App. 2d 45 (1974)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gustafson v. Cotco Enterprises, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals
42 Ohio App. 2d 45 (1974)

JL

Facts

Gustafson (plaintiff) owned property in Berlin Township. Cotco Enterprises (defendant) purchased property nearby. Cotco’s plans to operate a drag strip for racing on the property became public. Cotco planned to have races each Sunday from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., including approximately 280 time trials and races. Gustafson and other nearby landowners (plaintiffs) opposed the plan and made their opposition known to Cotco. Although Berlin Township did not have zoning regulations, the plaintiffs asserted that the operation of the drag strip would constitute a public nuisance. Cotco had made plans for a tall fence to reduce the impact of dust, fumes, dirt, and lighting on the landowners. However, the landowners continued to be concerned about the level of noise that would be generated at the drag strip. The landowners sued Cotco. The landowners presented testimony and evidence regarding the sound levels of funny cars, dragsters, and stock cars. The trial court entered an injunction against the construction and operation of the drag strip. Cotco appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lynch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership