Guy v. Guy

98 Idaho 205, 560 P.2d 876 (1977)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Guy v. Guy

Idaho Supreme Court
98 Idaho 205, 560 P.2d 876 (1977)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

In 1964, Walter Guy (plaintiff) became insured under a group term disability-insurance policy offered through his employer, Litton Industries (LI). The policy was renewed annually, and LI paid all premiums as part of Walter’s compensation. In 1970, Walter married Elizabeth Guy (defendant), who was totally physically disabled. In 1973, when Walter was 49 years old, he became disabled because of vascular damage caused by advanced arteriosclerosis. Walter’s employment was terminated shortly after, and Walter began receiving payments under the disability-insurance policy. Provided that Walter remained totally disabled, he would continue to receive monthly payments until the age of 65. Walter filed for divorce and argued that the disability payments should be classified as his separate property. The trial court disagreed, holding that the disability payments must be classified as community property and allocated between Walter and Elizabeth going forward. Walter appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Shepard, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership