From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Guyette v. Schmer
Nebraska Supreme Court
35 N.W.2d 689 (1949)
Patty Guyette (plaintiff) was riding her horse along a road when she and the horse were struck from behind by a truck driven by Willard Schmer (defendant). Guyette sued Schmer to recover for her injuries. It was disputed at trial how close Guyette and the horse were to the side of the road when the accident occurred. Strong was a witness to the accident, although he was in his car approximately 1,150 feet away when it occurred. Strong testified that he saw Guyette and the horse on the side of the road when the accident occurred. Schmer argued that Strong’s testimony was not competent given his distance from the accident when it occurred. The trial court granted Schmer’s motion for a directed verdict. Guyette appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Carter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.