Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.

Supreme Court of California
8 P.3d 1089 (Cal. 2000)


John Guz (plaintiff) began working for Bechtel National, Inc. (Bechtel) (defendant) in 1971 as an administrative assistant. Over the years, Guz received a number of raises and promotions, as well as favorable performance reviews. In 1991, Bechtel issued Personnel Policy 1101, which essentially stated that employees were employed at will. However, Personnel Policy 1101 limited Bechtel’s ability to terminate employees for unsatisfactory performance by requiring Bechtel to first provide employees with notice of a deficiency and an opportunity to improve. Personnel Policy 1101 also addressed layoffs, which were defined as terminations caused by reductions in work, by reorganizations, or by other circumstances. No limitations were placed on Bechtel’s ability to lay off employees. In 1992, Guz was working in Bechtel’s BNI Management Information Group (BNI-MI) when Bechtel decided to eliminate the BNI-MI. As a result, Guz was laid off. Guz sued Bechtel, claiming that his layoff breached an implied contract to be terminated only for good cause. Guz also claimed that the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing precluded Bechtel from terminating him arbitrarily or in bad faith. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Bechtel. The court of appeal reversed. Bechtel appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.


The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Baxter, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.