Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.

United States Supreme Court
484 U.S. 49 (1987)


Facts

Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. and Natural Resources Defense Council (plaintiffs) filed suit in federal court against Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. (defendant), seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and alleging that the company had violated, and continued to violate, its Virginia State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permit by exceeding effluent limitations on five of the seven pollutants covered by the permit in violation of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Specifically, plaintiffs claimed Gwaltney’s meat-packing plant discharged excessive amounts of fecal coliform, chlorine, and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) into the Pagan River. The district court granted partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs and held that Gwaltney had violated, and continued to be in violation of, the CWA. Before the district court reached a decision regarding an appropriate penalty, Gwaltney filed a motion for dismissal of the complaint on the ground § 505(a) of the CWA required a defendant to be in violation of the CWA at the time the suit was filed and because the last recorded violation occurred several weeks before plaintiffs filed the complaint, Gwaltney claimed the court lacked jurisdiction over the matter. The district court disagreed and held for plaintiffs. The court of appeals affirmed. Gwaltney appealed. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 169,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.