GYM-N-I Playgrounds, Inc. v. Snider

220 S.W.3d 905 (2007)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

GYM-N-I Playgrounds, Inc. v. Snider

Supreme Court of Texas
220 S.W.3d 905 (2007)

Facts

Ron Snider (plaintiff) leased a commercial warehouse to GYM-N-I Playgrounds (GYM-N-I) (defendant). GYM-N-I manufactured playground equipment in the warehouse. In Texas, if the lease does not discuss the issue, landlords impliedly warrant that premises are suitable for the intended purpose. However, this lease specifically provided that GYM-N-I accepted the building as is and expressly waived any warranties on behalf of Snider. The lease also contained a holdover provision that stated: “any holding over without written consent of Landlord shall constitute a lease from month-to-month, under the terms and provisions of this Lease to the extent applicable to a tenancy from month-to-month.” The lease expired in September 1996. The parties did not execute a new lease, but GYM-N-I continued to pay and Snider continued to accept monthly rent until a fire destroyed the building in August 2000. Snider’s insurance company sued GYM-N-I, seeking reimbursement for the insurance claim money it had paid to Snider. GYM-N-I filed cross claims and third party claims against Snider alleging that defective electrical wiring and the lack of a sprinkler system caused the fire. Snider argued that the lease’s as-is clause and warranty disclaimer barred GYM-N-I’s claims. GYM-N-I argued that the as-is clause did not survive when the original lease expired. The trial court found for Snider. GYM-N-I appealed. The appeals court affirmed. GYM-N-I appealed again.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jefferson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 748,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership