GYM-N-I Playgrounds, Inc. v. Snider
Supreme Court of Texas
220 S.W.3d 905 (2007)
- Written by Rebecca Green, JD
Facts
Ron Snider (plaintiff) leased a commercial warehouse to GYM-N-I Playgrounds (GYM-N-I) (defendant). GYM-N-I manufactured playground equipment in the warehouse. In Texas, if the lease does not discuss the issue, landlords impliedly warrant that premises are suitable for the intended purpose. However, this lease specifically provided that GYM-N-I accepted the building as is and expressly waived any warranties on behalf of Snider. The lease also contained a holdover provision that stated: “any holding over without written consent of Landlord shall constitute a lease from month-to-month, under the terms and provisions of this Lease to the extent applicable to a tenancy from month-to-month.” The lease expired in September 1996. The parties did not execute a new lease, but GYM-N-I continued to pay and Snider continued to accept monthly rent until a fire destroyed the building in August 2000. Snider’s insurance company sued GYM-N-I, seeking reimbursement for the insurance claim money it had paid to Snider. GYM-N-I filed cross claims and third party claims against Snider alleging that defective electrical wiring and the lack of a sprinkler system caused the fire. Snider argued that the lease’s as-is clause and warranty disclaimer barred GYM-N-I’s claims. GYM-N-I argued that the as-is clause did not survive when the original lease expired. The trial court found for Snider. GYM-N-I appealed. The appeals court affirmed. GYM-N-I appealed again.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jefferson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.