H.R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.
Court of Appeals of New York
159 N.E. 896 (N.Y. 1928)
Rensselaer Water (defendant) contracted with the city of Rensselaer to supply water to the city’s fire hydrants. H.R. Moch’s (Moch) (plaintiff) warehouse caught fire and Rensselaer Water did not supply enough water to the nearby hydrant to put out the fire, causing damages to the warehouse. Moch brought suit against Rensselaer Water, claiming breach of contract as a third party beneficiary as well as common law tort. Rensselaer Water filed a motion to dismiss the claim which the trial court denied. The appellate court reversed, granting the motion to dismiss. Moch appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cardozo, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.