Hacker v. Hacker

522 N.Y.S.2d 768 (1987)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hacker v. Hacker

New York Supreme Court
522 N.Y.S.2d 768 (1987)

  • Written by Mike Begovic, JD

Facts

Ruth Hacker (plaintiff) and Seymour Hacker (defendant) entered into a separation agreement (the agreement) establishing obligations for child-support payments for the benefit of their daughter, Emily. Under the agreement, Seymour’s termination of child support would be deferred on Emily’s twenty-first birthday if she was pursuing a college education with reasonable diligence and on a continual basis. In any event, Seymour’s obligation to pay child support would terminate on Emily’s twenty-second birthday. Between the time of her twenty-first and twenty-second birthdays, Emily attended the Neighborhood Playhouse (the academy), a school for theater training approved by the New York State Education Department. The academy did not offer degrees, but it did require that students be 18 years old and high school graduates. Seymour paid Emily’s tuition at the academy and supported her pursuit of acting, but he did not pay child support during this time. Ruth filed an action seeking a judgment against Seymour for unpaid child support during this time, claiming that Emily’s enrollment in the academy fell within the definition of college as contemplated by the agreement. Seymour argued that the academy could not be considered a college, because it did not offer a four-year degree, and consequently, that he was relieved from paying child support for that time period.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Danzig, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership