Haeussler v. De Loretto
Court of Appeal of California
240 P.2d 654 (1952)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Harold Haeussler (plaintiff) went to the house of his neighbor, Emil De Loretto (defendant), at night to inquire about Haeussler’s dog, which was missing and which often went next door. When De Loretto opened the door, Haeussler’s dog ran out. Haeussler loudly protested De Loretto’s taking the dog, and the men began to argue. Haeussler was waving his hands and his face was flushed as though intoxicated. De Loretto grew somewhat afraid, in particular because he knew that Haeussler had assaulted a friend of his in the past. When De Loretto ordered Haeussler to leave, Haeussler moved forward aggressively. De Loretto punched Haeussler in the face, damaging two of Haeussler’s teeth. Haeussler sued De Loretto in a California state court for assault and battery. De Loretto pleaded self-defense. After a nonjury trial, the court found in De Loretto’s favor. Haeussler appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Vallée, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.