Hahn v. Duveen

234 N.Y.S. 185 (1929)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hahn v. Duveen

New York Supreme Court
234 N.Y.S. 185 (1929)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

Andree Hahn (plaintiff) claimed to own an original painting by Leonardo da Vinci. Hahn sought to sell the painting to the Kansas City Art Museum. However, during negotiations, Joseph Duveen (defendant) told a reporter that Hahn’s painting was not a genuine da Vinci despite the fact he had not seen Hahn’s painting. Duveen asserted that the genuine version of the painting was in the Louvre. After these assertions by Duveen, the Kansas City Art Museum called off negotiations. Hahn brought an action against Duveen for slander of title. At trial, Duveen testified as to his expert opinion, stating that the painting in the Louvre was the original painting by da Vinci. Hahn submitted evidence of expert x-ray analysis of her painting. Hahn claimed that x-rays showed that her painting, which had been cut and partially painted over, matched the description from a catalogue that described the painting in 1709. One of Hahn’s experts opined that the da Vinci painting in the Louvre was by Lucretia Crivelli. In response, Duveen put forth his own experts to offer testimony on the two paintings. Duveen moved to dismiss the case, but the case went to the jury for deliberation. After 14 hours, the jury determined that it was impossible to reach a unanimous verdict. Duveen renewed his motion to dismiss.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership