Halberstadt v. New York Life Insurance Company
New York Court of Appeals
194 N.Y. 1, 86 N.E. 801 (1909)
- Written by Sarah Hoffman, JD
Facts
The New York Life Insurance Company (New York Life) (defendant), through its agents, charged Siegmund Halberstadt (plaintiff) with the crime of embezzlement in Mexico City. As a result of the charge of embezzlement, a warrant was issued for Halberstadt. Halberstadt fled Mexico, and the warrant was never served on him. Eventually, the prosecutors in Mexico dismissed the charges against Halberstadt. After the charges were dismissed, Halberstadt filed a malicious-prosecution suit against New York Life. The trial court found in favor of New York Life, and Halberstadt appealed. On appeal, New York Life argued that charges were dismissed because Halberstadt fled Mexico, not because the charges had been adjudicated in Halberstadt’s favor, and Halberstadt must therefore not be permitted to pursue a claim for malicious prosecution.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hiscock, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.