Haley v. Medtronic, Inc.
United States District Court for the Central District of California
169 F.R.D. 643 (1996)
![SR](https://quimbee-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/educator/photo/134/Sara_Kang.webp)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
Medtronic, Inc. (Medtronic) (defendant) manufactured pacemakers that were allegedly defective. Haley (plaintiff) received one of Medtronic’s pacemakers. Although her pacemaker had not failed, Haley sued Medtronic for emotional distress caused by her fear of her pacemaker’s failure and the prospect of possibly needing surgery to remove it. Haley sought class certification on behalf of over 66,000 people who had pacemakers from Medtronic. The complaint alleged negligence, products liability, breach of warranty, and fraud, and sought money damages and injunctive relief requiring the establishment of a program to monitor the health of class members. Haley moved to obtain class certification for the plaintiffs’ money damages under Rule 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) and class certification for the plaintiffs’ injunctive relief under Rule 23(b)(2).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rea, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.