Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Hall v. Hilbun

Supreme Court of Mississippi
466 So.2d 856 (1985)


Facts

Dr. Glyn Hilbun (defendant), a general surgeon, examined Terry Hall (plaintiff) who was complaining of abdominal pain. Hilbun concluded that there was likely an obstruction in Hall’s small bowel and recommended an exploratory surgical procedure, which was performed with Hall’s consent. After the procedure, Hilbun accompanied Hall back to her private room. At that time, Hall’s vital signs were stable and she was alert and communicating with Hilbun. Shortly thereafter, Hilbun left the hospital for the evening. That night, Hall repeatedly complained of abdominal pain to her nurses and her husband. Throughout the evening and night, Hilbun did not follow-up on Hall’s condition and the nursing staff did not call him. Early the next morning Hilbun was called to the hospital when Hall’s condition rapidly deteriorated. By the time Hilbun arrived, Hall had died. At autopsy revealed that a sponge had been left in Hall’s abdominal cavity, but had not contributed to her death. Hall’s husband filed a malpractice/wrongful death action against Hilbun alleging that he failed to inquire about Hall’s post-operation recovery and failed to give appropriate post-operation instructions to the hospital nursing staff. At trial, Hall’s husband called Dr. Hoerr as an expert witness to establish a national standard of care applicable to all surgeons including the duty to “follow the patient” through the first several hours after surgery to monitor for complications. The trial court disqualified Hoerr as a expert witness because he was not familiar with the local standard of care. Hilbun was granted a directed verdict and Hall’s husband appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Robertson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.