Hall v. Vance County Board of Education

774 F.2d 629 (1985)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hall v. Vance County Board of Education

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
774 F.2d 629 (1985)

Facts

James Hall was a boy with above-average intelligence and dyslexia. James had struggled with schoolwork from a young age, and testing in second grade showed that he was significantly behind his peers in reading. Despite a recommendation from the school’s psychologist that James receive further evaluation, special help, and part-time placement in a learning-disability class, the Vance County Board of Education (the district) (defendant) and the school failed to take any such action. James failed second grade and continued to struggle academically. The school eventually created an individualized educational program (IEP) for James, which consisted only of placing him in a learning-disabilities classroom for a few hours a week. James showed little academic progress over the next few years. By fifth grade, testing showed that James was functionally illiterate, with reading-comprehension skills so low as to be untestable. James’s parents, the Halls (plaintiffs) enrolled James in a private school, where he quickly made substantial progress. The Halls sought reimbursement for James’s private-school tuition from the district. The district refused and proposed that James be placed back in the public school with a modified IEP. An administrative review of the matter by state officials held that placement in the public school was appropriate but that the district’s proposed IEP was inadequate. The Halls then sued the district in federal court. The court held that the district had failed to provide James with a free appropriate public education (FAPE) in past years, could not provide a FAPE to James during the coming school year, and must pay the costs for James’s private schooling. The district appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Winter, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership