Hamacher v. Commissioner

94 T.C. 348 (1990)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hamacher v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
94 T.C. 348 (1990)

Facts

Alfred Hamacher (plaintiff) worked for the Alliance Theatre in Atlanta, Georgia, in two roles: as an independent contractor performing in plays and as an employee teaching theater and serving as an administrator for the theater’s acting school. Hamacher used two offices in connection with his work for the theater. First, the theater provided an office Hamacher could use for his employment duties that was shared with other employees. Second, Hamacher had a home office where he spent about half of his rehearsal time for stage roles (the other half took place at the rehearsal hall) and performed some portion of his employment duties when he wanted to avoid interruptions. The theater did not require that Hamacher maintain a home office. Hamacher spent more time working at the theater office than at his home office. Hamacher deducted expenses related to the home office, and the commissioner of internal revenue (defendant) disallowed the deduction. Hamacher petitioned the tax court for review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gerber, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership