Hamburg Flood Control Case
Federal Republic of Germany Federal Constitutional Court
24 BVerfGE 367 (1968)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
Hamburg, Germany suffered flooding that caused significant damage. In response, the government of Hamburg enacted legislation to seize dikeland—grass-covered private land—to help with controlling future flood. The legislation also included a method for compensating the private owners of this dikeland. However, owners of the dikeland challenged the legislation under Article 14 of the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany (the Basic Law).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

