Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Hamill v. Maryland Casualty Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
209 F.2d 338 (10th Cir. 1954)


Facts

Gunnell Construction Company (Gunnell) (defendant), in need of capital, reached an investment agreement with Don Hamill (defendant). Hamill agreed to advance 10% of any construction contracts that Gunnell entered into in exchange for 10% of any net profits that Gunnell made on the contracts. Under this agreement, Gunnell entered into a contract to build an addition onto a school. Gunnell applied to the Maryland Casualty Co. (Maryland) (plaintiff) for a performance bond. Maryland stated that Gunnell had insufficient working capital to issue the bond, at which point Gunnell showed Maryland its contract with Hamill. With this contract backing Gunnell’s financial stability, Maryland issued the performance bond. During the school project, Gunnell encountered financial problems and could not pay all of its bills. Hamill nonetheless demanded repayment under their agreement and Gunnell paid. Maryland then paid Gunnell’s outstanding bills to discharge Maryland’s obligations on the performance bond. Maryland then brought suit against Hamill and Gunnell, seeking repayment of the performance bond. The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico ruled in favor of Maryland against Hamill, finding that Maryland was a third party beneficiary to the Hamill-Gunnell contract and that Hamill breached the contract by demanding repayment of his investment before the project’s bills were paid in full. Hamill appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Murrah, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 200,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.