Hamilton National Bank v. Belt
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
93 U.S. App. D.C. 168, 210 F.2d 706 (1953)
- Written by Sarah Hoffman, JD
Facts
Lloyd Belt (plaintiff) developed an idea for a weekly radio program. Each week would feature a different high school’s glee club and orchestra, as well as students in other capacities. He had a specific plan to present it as part of each school’s curriculum, treat it as a class, and hold the performances as assemblies. Specific talent and acts would be selected at each school and could not be scripted ahead of time, but the plan was fairly detailed. It included the format of the programming, the order of events, a lack of commercials, the use of school buildings, and other details. Belt entered into an agreement with Hamilton National Bank (the bank) (defendant) to sponsor the program. After approaching school authorities, Belt could not reach an agreement with them, and his contract with the bank ended. The bank was approached by school authorities for exactly the same program and ended up sponsoring it directly with the school district. Belt filed suit against the bank on the grounds that it had appropriated his idea. The jury found in favor of Belt, and the bank appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fahy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.