Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Hamilton v. Accu-Tek

62 F. Supp. 2d 802 (1999)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...

Hamilton v. Accu-Tek

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York

62 F. Supp. 2d 802 (1999)

Facts

A group of people whose relatives were killed or injured by handguns (collectively, the families) filed a negligence action against 25 handgun manufacturers (the manufacturers). The families claimed that the manufacturers were negligent in their marketing and distribution practices, which created an underground market for handguns and made access to handguns easier for youths and violent criminals. A jury found 15 of the manufacturers were negligent and nine were the proximate cause of the families’ injuries. The jury awarded damages to only one of the plaintiffs, Steven Fox, who was 16 years old when he was shot by his 16-year-old friend with a handgun the friend bought from the trunk of a car and that disappeared after the shooting. The jury awarded $4 million in damages, apportioned between three manufacturers as follows: American Arms, Inc., 0.23 percent; Beretta U.S.A. Corp., 6.03 percent, and Taurus International Manufacturing, Inc. 6.8 percent. The jury found the manufacturers that restricted sales of their handguns not negligent. Following the verdict, the manufacturers moved for judgment as a matter of law.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Weinstein, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership