Hamilton v. York

987 F. Supp. 953 (1997)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hamilton v. York

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
987 F. Supp. 953 (1997)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Larry York, doing business as HLT Check Exchange, LLP (HLT) (defendant), operated a check-cashing company in Kentucky. Consumers would give HLT a check in exchange for cash. HLT would hold the check for two weeks before cashing the check or giving the check back to consumers in exchange for the amount on the check. HLT charged a fee of 20 percent for its services. Consumers could extend the transaction for a week—giving them extra time to pay HLT or put money in their checking account—for an additional 10 percent fee. Gregory and Dana Hamilton (plaintiffs) used HLT’s check-cashing service. The Hamiltons eventually sued HLT in federal district court, alleging that HLT violated Kentucky’s usury laws—which capped interest rates on loans of less than $15,000 at 19 percent—and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act by charging unlawfully high interest rates. The Hamiltons argued that although HLT referred to its service as check cashing, it was in substance a short-term loan with an annual interest rate of 520 percent. HLT moved to dismiss the Hamiltons’ complaint, arguing that the fees it charged were service fees for cashing checks, not interest on loans.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hood, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership