Hammer v. Today's Health Care II, Co.

Nos. CV2011-051310 and -051311 (April 17, 2012)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hammer v. Today’s Health Care II, Co.

Maricopa County, Arizona, Superior Court
Nos. CV2011-051310 and -051311 (April 17, 2012)

  • Written by Patrick Speice, JD

Facts

Michele Hammer (plaintiff) loaned $250,000 to Today’s Health Care II (THC) (defendant) for the express purpose of building a medical-marijuana center to cultivate and distribute marijuana in Colorado, which had enacted a medical-marijuana law allowing such activities. THC failed to repay the loan as required by the loan agreement and related promissory note, and Hammer sued THC for breach of contract. Hammer moved for summary judgment, claiming that the loan agreement and promissory note were enforceable contracts. THC also moved for summary judgment, arguing that the contracts were unenforceable as against public policy because the purpose was to facilitate an unlawful act—construction of a medical-marijuana center. Although construction and operation of a medical-marijuana center in Colorado was legal under Colorado’s medical-marijuana law, the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) prohibited the cultivation and distribution of marijuana and use of real property for engaging in prohibited marijuana-related activities.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McVey, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership