Hampton v. Dillard Department Stores

247 F.3d 1091 (2001)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hampton v. Dillard Department Stores

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
247 F.3d 1091 (2001)

RW

Facts

Two African American women, Paula Darlene Hampton and Demetria Cooper (plaintiffs), were shopping at a Dillard Department Stores, Inc. (Dillard’s) (defendant) store. Hampton was at the fragrance counter, attempting to redeem a coupon for a free cologne sample. A Dillard’s security guard who had Hampton and Cooper under surveillance came to the counter and accused both women of shoplifting. An investigation quickly proved the women’s innocence. Hampton and Cooper sued Dillard’s for violating 42 U.S.C. § 1981. At trial in federal district court, the jury found the following: (1) Dillard’s offer of a free sample was intended to entice Hampton into its store, and Hampton, upon entering, accepted Dillard’s offer and therefore had a contractual right to claim her sample; (2) Dillard’s employee intentionally interfered with that right; and (3) Dillard’s history of disproportionately putting African American shoppers under surveillance was indirect evidence that the interference was racially motivated. The trial court dismissed Cooper’s claim but awarded Hampton compensatory and punitive damages plus attorney’s fees. Dillard’s appealed to the Tenth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Henry, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership