From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...
Hampton v. United States
United States Supreme Court
425 U.S. 484 (1976)
Hampton (defendant) told an acquaintance that he knew where to procure heroin and was interested in finding a buyer in order to make some money. Unbeknownst to Hampton, the acquaintance was an informant for the federal Drug Enforcement Administration. The informant told Hampton that he could find a buyer for Hampton’s heroin. The informant arranged a meeting between Hampton and an undercover DEA agent. Hampton sold heroin to the agent on two different occasions. After the second sale, Hampton was arrested. At trial, Hampton asserted that he had not knowingly sold heroin. Hampton claimed that the DEA informant had provided all the drugs he sold to the undercover agents. Hampton requested a non-standard jury instruction as to the affirmative defense of entrapment. The trial court refused to accept the non-standard instruction. Hampton was convicted after a jury trial. Hampton appealed and the court of appeals affirmed the judgment of conviction. Hampton petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)
Concurrence (Powell, J.)
Dissent (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.