Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,400+ case briefs...

Hand v. Dayton-Hudson

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
775 F.2d 757 (1985)


John Hand (plaintiff) was an attorney employed by the Dayton-Hudson Corporation (the Company) (defendant) from 1967 to 1982. Hand was allegedly terminated as a result of a restructuring by the Company. The Company offered to pay Hand $38,000 if Hand agreed to release the Company from all claims. Hand originally refused the offer, claiming that he was entitled to the same sum under the terms of his employment contract. The Company prepared the release and gave Hand a deadline to accept or reject the offer. Prior to the deadline, Hand prepared a different release that looked exactly the same as the original release except that Hand added “except as to claims of age discrimination and breach of contract.” The new release was written with the same type and model of typewriter and all other aspects of the release were identical to the original release. Hand brought the new release to a meeting with the Company’s agent, who signed it. Hand sued the Company alleging age discrimination and breach of contract. The Company requested that the trial court reform the release to the original offer and moved for summary judgment. The trial court approved the request and granted summary judgment. Hand appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Contie, J.)

Concurrence (Wellford, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 496,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 496,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,400 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Why does the end of the reasoning say "reformation of the contract was appropriate" when it sounds like Hand wasn't allowed to reform the contract?

Want to see this answer?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and get access to all answers in our Q&A database

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial

Tempor minim nulla id mollit ullamco consequat aliquip adipisicing irure officia tempor. Magna sit eiusmod laborum proident laboris ex sunt. Non labore ex officia irure qui et laboris aliqua in minim. Labore velit aliqua proident officia cillum occaecat dolore tempor. Ullamco in consequat labore amet laborum proident reprehenderit anim cillum excepteur. Elit do nostrud nisi excepteur sit dolor pariatur fugiat. Nisi incididunt incididunt do est velit excepteur enim excepteur incididunt mollit pariatur. Irure tempor non in esse do. Laboris eiusmod in ad ut enim est duis ad sint veniam eiusmod. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt.