Handel v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.
Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
252 App.Div. 142, 297 N.Y.S. 216, 277 N.Y. 548,13 N.E.2d 468 (1938)
- Written by John Waller, JD
Facts
Handel was seriously injured when he fell from a train car, became caught in the car door, and was dragged along the tracks on the New York Rapid Transit Corp.’s (NYRTC) (defendant) elevated railroad. He eventually died as a result of his injuries. Handel’s estate (plaintiff) sued NYRTC for negligence, alleging in its complaint that the conductor of the train closed the car door on Handel, which caused him to fall from the train and eventually led to his death. The only proof of this claim was a declaration Handel made to a witness minutes after being gravely injured in the accident. If permitted, the witness would have testified that Handel said, “Save me. Help me. Why did that conductor close the door on me?” The trial court excluded Handel’s statement as hearsay, and dismissed the complaint because it lacked any proof of NYRTC’s negligence. Handel’s estate appealed on the basis that the evidence was wrongly excluded.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Taylor, J.)
Dissent (Close, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.