Court of Appeals of Illinois
99 N.E.2d 23 (1951)
Handzel (plaintiff) entered into a contract to purchase real property from Bassi (defendant). The contract required Handzel to make a down payment followed by annual installments and to secure a mortgage for the balance remaining on the contract after half the purchase price had been paid. The contract also included a clause providing that any assignment of the contract or of Handzel’s interests in the contract without Bassi’s advance consent would afford Bassi the right to terminate the contract. Handzel made payment as required under the terms of the contract. Prior to the due date for the last scheduled installment payment, Handzel entered into an agreement to sell the property to a third party. Handzel did not seek prior consent to the agreement from Bassi. Bassi notified Handzel that the third party purchase agreement violated the original contract. Bassi offered Handzel time to cure the breach and informed that upon failure to cure Bassi would exercise the right to terminate the contract and all moneys paid would be forfeited as liquidated damages. When Handzel failed to perform as demanded, Bassi gave notice that the contract was deemed terminated and demanded that Handzel surrender possession of the property. Prior to the deadline for surrender of possession, Handzel tendered the final contract payment, offered to obtain a mortgage for the remaining balance, and demanded production of a deed to the property. Handzel filed a petition for a temporary order restraining Bassi from terminating the contract. Handzel additionally requested a permanent injunction, a declaratory judgment that the contract remained in full force, and an order commanding specific performance from Bassi. The trial court granted a temporary injunction. Bassi moved to vacate the temporary injunction. The trial court denied Bassi’s motion to vacate. Bassi appealed the motion denial.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Dove, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.