From our private database of 30,900+ case briefs...
Hanford v. Connecticut Fair Association
Connecticut Supreme Court
103 A. 838 (1918)
Walter Hanford and the Babyland Amusement Company (Hanford) (plaintiffs) contracted with the Connecticut Fair Association (defendant) regarding the production of a baby show and competition to be held at a park in Hartford, Connecticut in September of 1916. They expected to attract many babies to the park and award prizes after inspecting and comparing the babies’ traits. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, Hanford would supply advertising materials and 120 prizes for the show. The association agreed to provide a room for the show and pay Hanford $600. However, beginning in August of 1916, an epidemic of infantile paralysis swept through Connecticut and caused the death or permanent disability of many babies and children. In the middle of August, the association contacted Hanford and canceled the contract, claiming that holding the baby show as planned would be highly dangerous because of the serious health risks of bringing together a large group of young children. Hanford sued the association for breach of contract. In its answer to Hanford’s complaint, the association asserted that the public-health risks of holding the baby show meant that performing the contract would be contrary to public policy. Hanford objected to the association’s answer in a demurrer, arguing that the association made an absolute and unqualified promise to perform. The trial court overruled the demurrer, and Hanford appealed to the Connecticut Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Shumway, J.)
Dissent (Beach, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 553,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 553,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.