From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Hanlin v. Mitchelson
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
794 F.2d 834 (2d Cir. 1986)
Hermine Hanlin (plaintiff) entered a partnership agreement with members of the Manhattans singing group. The Manhattans won a Grammy award and later had a disagreement with Hanlin. The Manhattans and Hanlin all claimed they were owed money, and the dispute went to arbitration. Hanlin hired an attorney, Marvin Mitchelson (defendant), to represent him. Hanlin had an oral agreement with Mitchelson under which Hanlin would pay a flat fee of $25,000 in advance, plus any expenses. The arbitrator found that Hanlin had an interest in some of the Manhattans’ contracts and directed the Manhattans to execute assignments of contract to Hanlin. Hanlin was awarded $20,620 in the arbitration and was also ordered to pay $26,750 to the Manhattans’ manager. Mitchelson did not file to confirm the arbitration award. Hanlin was unhappy with the arbitration outcome and wanted to appeal. After many attempts to reach Mitchelson with no response, Hanlin received a letter explaining that the arbitration award was not appealable and noting that Hanlin still owed Mitchelson expenses. Hanlin hired a second attorney and sued Mitchelson for damages, alleging negligence and malpractice. Hanlin later moved to amend her complaint based on Mitchelson’s failure to confirm the arbitration award within the statute of limitations. The court denied the motion for leave to amend and dismissed the complaint. The court based its decision on three findings, one of which was that the allegations in the proposed amended complaint were frivolous, because Mitchelson had terminated his representation of Hanlin before the alleged failure to confirm the arbitration award. Hanlin appealed the denial for leave to amend.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Meskill, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.