Hanlon v. Chrysler Corporation
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
150 F.3d 1011 (1998)
While the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) investigated problems with rear latches in Chrysler minivans, several class actions were filed against Chrysler Corporation (defendant), seeking latch replacement and damages. Chrysler began negotiating settlements for the various actions, resulting in consolidation of the cases in federal court. Hanlon and the other named plaintiffs of the consolidated action (plaintiffs) represented all 50 states and all affected Chrysler models. Three days after consolidation, the parties proposed a settlement restricted to claims for latch replacement, which the court preliminarily approved. The same day, the court certified a nationwide class of Chrysler minivan owners and barred class members from commencing proceedings in other tribunals. Notice was sent to 4.3 million class members, informing them of the settlement’s binding nature and their ability to opt out, which 971 chose to do. In contravention to the court’s order, class member Robert Kempton filed a class action in a Georgia state court, asserting that he was opting out all Georgia class members from the Hanlon settlement. The Hanlon court enjoined Kempton from proceeding and held that he could only opt out himself. The NHTSA closed its investigation, concluding that Chrysler’s proposed action—free replacement with improved latches on all affected vehicles—was satisfactory. The Hanlon court held three fairness hearings regarding the settlement. Objectors complained about the settlement’s adequacy in light of Chrysler’s agreement with the NHTSA. The court approved the settlement, as well as $5 million in attorneys’ fees to class counsel. Objectors to the settlement appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 710,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 710,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.