Hansen v. Morgan
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
582 F.2d 1214 (1978)
- Written by Miller Jozwiak, JD
Facts
George Hansen (plaintiff) defeated an incumbent in a primary congressional election. After the primary, citizens lodged complaints against Hansen alleging that Hansen engaged in improper campaign finance practices. The complaints led to an investigation of Hansen by a congressional committee on which the incumbent was serving. Melvin Morgan (defendant) ran a business that was a member of the Pocatello Credit Bureau (bureau). As a bureau member, the business was entitled to receive credit reports from it. Morgan decided to obtain Hansen’s credit report, which Morgan then submitted to the incumbent’s office in Washington, DC. The report made it to the committee investigating Hansen for alleged campaign finance issues. Eventually, Hansen learned of the report and sued Morgan for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by willfully or negligently failing to comply with the act. Morgan eventually moved for summary judgment. Morgan argued that the report was not a consumer report under the FCRA and that the act therefore did not apply. The district court granted Morgan’s motion for summary judgment. Hansen appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Carter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
