Haraguchi v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
43 Cal. 4th 706, 182 P.3d 579, 76 Cal. Rptr. 3d. 250 (2008)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
In 2005, Massey Harushi Haraguchi (plaintiff) was charged with rape of an intoxicated person. Deputy District Attorney Joyce Dudley represented the state in its prosecution of Haraguchi. Haraguchi’s criminal-defense attorney alleged that Dudley refused to engage in plea negotiations, asserting that she wanted the case to go to trial. In addition to being a prosecutor, Dudley had also written a novel called Intoxicating Agent, wherein the main character was a district attorney trying an intoxicated-rape case. In 2006, around the time Haraguchi’s criminal trial was set to begin, the book was published. Dudley locally promoted her book at bookstores and via television interviews. Haraguchi moved for Dudley’s recusal, alleging that the plot in the book had significant overlap with his case and that her promotion unfairly influenced how she handled the case. The trial court denied Haraguchi’s motion, finding that there was no significant conflict warranting recusal because the overlap in detail was coincidental, the book was unrelated to Haraguchi’s case, and the publishing and promoting of the book was not prejudicial. On appeal, the court of appeal declined to defer to the ruling of the trial court because it “had no precedent to guide it.” Thus, without deference, the court of appeal held that the evidence showed that Dudley’s interest in promoting her book were so great that it presented a conflict as to Haraguchi’s ability to receive a fair trial.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Werdegar, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.