Harbison v. Little
United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
511 F. Supp. 2d 872 (2007)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Edward Jerome Harbison (defendant) was convicted of first-degree murder and was sentenced to death. Harbison appealed, petitioned for post-conviction relief, and petitioned for habeas corpus; Harbison's conviction and sentence were upheld in each of these proceedings. Tennessee adopted a new lethal-injection protocol that provided for the administration of three drugs, sodium thiopental, pancuronium bromide, and potassium chloride, in quick succession without checking to see if the prisoner was unconscious. The last two drugs would cause an agonizing death without sufficient anesthesia. Due to the particular risks associated with pancuronium bromide, that drug was not permitted for use in euthanizing animals under Tennessee law. Harbison filed an amended complaint in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, asserting that his scheduled execution under the state's new lethal-injection protocol violated his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Trauger, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.