Hardt v. Vitae Foundation
Missouri Court of Appeals
302 S.W.3d 133 (2009)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Selma Hartke’s estate (plaintiff) made two gifts of approximately $4 million to the Vitae Foundation, Inc. (Vitae) (defendant), a charitable corporation. The estate placed terms and conditions on how both gifts were to be used, and Vitae agreed to these terms. Later, the estate’s executors, Edwin and Karl Hardt (plaintiffs), learned that Vitae had not followed the agreed terms and conditions. For instance, Vitae had agreed to use much of the gift money to buy advertising for a particular cause. However, Vitae had not purchased the advertising and was using the money to pay for additional staff instead. The executors sued Vitae on the estate’s behalf, seeking an official accounting of how the gift funds had been used. The estate also asked to have the gift funds either (1) used as originally agreed, (2) returned, or (3) donated to a different charity chosen by the estate. The trial court ruled that the estate lacked standing to sue to enforce the gift’s terms and dismissed the lawsuit. The estate appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mitchell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
