Hardy v. United States
United States District Court for the District of Nevada
918 F. Supp. 312 (1996)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
The United States government (defendant) levied against property owned by Cathy Hardy (plaintiff) and her husband Ray Hardy in order to satisfy Ray’s federal income-tax delinquencies. Cathy filed suit against the government under the wrongful-levy statute, contending that the property was her separate property, not community property, and thus not subject to levy for Ray’s debts. The government moved for summary judgment. Cathy presented evidence that the down payment made on the land was funded by a divorce settlement from her previous marriage, and that she paid the mortgage with money she herself earned. Cathy and Ray each filed affidavits describing an oral agreement between them that each of their earnings retain the character of “separate property.” The government contested the existence of such an oral agreement.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Reed, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.