Hargrove v. Rich

604 S.E.2d 475 (2004)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hargrove v. Rich

Georgia Supreme Court
604 S.E.2d 475 (2004)

Facts

Cecil H. Rich was the mother of Frances Rich and Jack Rich (plaintiff). In her will, Cecil granted Frances a special power of appointment over one-fourth of her estate. This portion of Cecil’s estate was to be held in trust. The power authorized Frances to direct Cecil’s trustees to distribute the property to Frances’s brothers or sisters, nieces and nephews, or descendants of deceased nieces and nephews. Frances was authorized to exercise the power during her lifetime by delivering a signed, written document to the trustees or at her death by making express reference to the power in her will. Frances used her will to expressly exercise the power of appointment in favor of only one of her nieces, Frances Ann Hargrove (defendant) to the exclusion of her other nieces and nephews. After Frances Rich died, Jack filed a declaratory judgment action claiming an interest in the property and arguing that Frances had improperly exercised her power of appointment. The trial court found for Jack, and Hargrove appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hunstein, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership